Gautschi, Joel
E-Mail-Adresse
Geburtsdatum
Projekt
Organisationseinheiten
Berufsbeschreibung
Nachname
Vorname
Name
Suchergebnisse
Spannungsgeladene Vertrauensarbeit. Wie gelingt oder misslingt es, im Zwangskontext Vertrauen aufzubauen? Einige Antworten dazu aus einem Forschungsprojekt zum Feld der Sozialpädagogischen Familienbegleitung (SPF)
2022, Rotzetter, Fabienne, Becker-Lenz, Roland, Gautschi, Joel, Rüegger, Cornelia
Vertrauen in der Sozialpädagogischen Familienbegleitung. Ergebnisse eines SNF-Forschungsprojektes
2021-09-10, Becker-Lenz, Roland, Gautschi, Joel, Rotzetter, Fabienne, Rüegger, Cornelia
Trust building processes in mandatory social pedagogical family support settings: On the relevance of matching at the relationship level
2021-09-01, Becker-Lenz, Roland, Gautschi, Joel, Rotzetter, Fabienne, Rüegger, Cornelia
Zur Nutzung verschiedener Wissensformen in der Praxis Sozialer Arbeit. Erkenntnisse aus einer empirischen Analyse
2019, Rüegger, Cornelia, Becker-Lenz, Roland, Gautschi, Joel, Hollenstein, Lea, Kunz, Regula
How to investigate trust? Experiences from a research project on trust in mandatory social work
2021-11-01, Becker-Lenz, Roland, Gautschi, Joel, Rotzetter, Fabienne, Rüegger, Cornelia
Herstellung von Vertrauen in der sozial-pädagogischen Familienbegleitung. Bedeutung von Vertrauen und Vertrauensaufbau im Ausgangspunkt der Fallarbeit im Zwangskontext. Fachtagung zu aktueller Forschung aus dem Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutz
2021-09-01, Becker-Lenz, Roland, Gautschi, Joel, Rüegger, Cornelia
Empirical Methods for Studying Decision-Making in Child Welfare and Protection
2020, Gautschi, Joel, Benbenishty, Rami, Fluke, John D., López López, Mónica, Benbenishty, Rami, Knorth, Erik J., Baumann, Donald J.
Studying the complex nature of decision-making in child welfare and protection is challenging. Researcher in this field uses various empirical methods, each with its advantages and limitation. This chapter describes the current state of the art of the most prominent empirical methods used to study this subject and to identify empirical methods from other fields, with the potential to advance decision-making research in child protection. The authors briefly describe methods for decision-making research, give examples of how these methods were used, and critically assess their strengths and limitations. “Black-box” input-output analysis is reviewed, and the authors describe the use of case files and administrative data, agency surveys, and experimental designs with simulated cases. The chapter then describes methods to trace decision processes based on verbalization (think-aloud), behavior (tracing information acquisition), and people’s sense-making in everyday contexts (ethnographic observations). The review ends with recommendations of future directions for research on decision-making in child protection.
Professional challenges of trust building processes in mandatory social pedagogical family support settings
2021-09-01, Becker-Lenz, Roland, Rotzetter, Fabienne, Gautschi, Joel, Rüegger, Cornelia
Vertrauen im Zwangskontext. Praktiken, Funktionen und Risiken der Herstellung von Transparenz
2019-11-01, Becker-Lenz, Roland, Gautschi, Joel, Rotzetter, Fabienne, Rüegger, Cornelia