Buser, Daniela
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
Project
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
Buser
First Name
Daniela
Name
Buser, Daniela
12 results
Search results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 12
- PublicationField study regarding the work duration for the visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage(06.09.2022) Sterchi, Yanik; Buser, Daniela; Sauer, Juergen; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - Präsentation
- PublicationThe effects of workload and time on task on detection performance in X-ray cabin baggage screening(21.04.2022) Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sterchi, Yanik06 - Präsentation
- PublicationField study regarding the work duration for the visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage(21.03.2022) Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sterchi, Yanik06 - Präsentation
- PublicationFeldstudie zur aktuellen EU-Verordnung bzgl. der Arbeitsdauern bei der visuellen Inspektion von Gepäckröntgenbildern - Teil 2(03.03.2022) Sterchi, Yanik; Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - Präsentation
- PublicationField study: Time on task for X-ray screening of cabin baggage(10/2021) Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sterchi, Yanik06 - Präsentation
- PublicationArbeitsdauern bei der visuellen Inspektion von Gepäckröntgenbildern(05.03.2021) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - Präsentation
- PublicationTime on task and detection performance in cabin baggage X-ray screening(24.11.2020) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - Präsentation
- PublicationEinfluss von Arbeitsdauer und Pausen auf die Leistung von Sicherheitsbeauftragten während 60 Minuten Röntgenbildanalyse von Handgepäck(03.03.2020) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - Präsentation
- PublicationWhy stop after 20 minutes? Breaks and target prevalence in a 60-minute X-ray baggage screening task(Elsevier, 03/2020) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian [in: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics]Current EU regulation restricts continuously reviewing X-ray images of passenger baggage to 20-min duration as a precautionary measure to prevent performance decrements in airport security officers (screeners). However, this 20-min limit is not based on clear empirical evidence on how well screeners can sustain their performance over time. Our study tested screeners in a 60-min simulated X-ray cabin baggage screening task. One group took 10-min breaks after 20 min of screening; the other group worked without breaks. We found no decrease in performance over 60 min in either group. Breaks did not affect performance, but they did reduce the amount of subjective distress. By varying target prevalence, we found that da with a slope of about 0.6 is a more valid measure of detection performance than d’. Target prevalence caused a criterion shift. Our results provide a basis for conducting field studies of prolonged screening durations, and open the discussion on whether more flexible break policies and work schedules should be considered.01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
- PublicationEffects of time on task, breaks, and target prevalence on screener performance in an X-ray image inspection task(2019) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian; John, Mala [in: 53rd IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology]Currently, it is not clear how long security officers can maintain their performance when inspecting X-ray images of passenger bags for prohibited items. New technologies and working environments in airport security screening could profit from longer screening durations, and they might also facilitate performance upkeep. In our study, two groups of security officers conducted a one-hour simulated cabin baggage screening task. One group took 10-minute breaks every 20 minutes; the other worked continuously. Both groups worked under two different target prevalence conditions. Results showed a shift in response tendency that developed at the beginning of the task. Moreover, security officers were able to maintain their visual inspection performance over the course of one hour. There was no difference in performance between the group with breaks and the group without breaks. These results lay the groundwork for further testing longer screening durations in the field.04B - Beitrag Konferenzschrift