Progress in sensor technology - progress in process control? Part I: Sensor property investigation and classification
Loading...
Author (Corporation)
Publication date
2003
Typ of student thesis
Course of study
Collections
Type
01A - Journal article
Editors
Editor (Corporation)
Supervisor
Parent work
Water Science and Technology
Special issue
DOI of the original publication
Link
Series
Series number
Volume
47
Issue / Number
2
Pages / Duration
103-112
Patent number
Publisher / Publishing institution
IWA Publishing
Place of publication / Event location
Edition
Version
Programming language
Assignee
Practice partner / Client
Abstract
To ensure correctly operating control systems, the measurement and control equipment in WWTPs must be mutually consistent. The dynamic simulation of activated sludge systems could offer a suitable tool for designing and optimising control strategies. Ideal or simplified sensor models represent a limiting factor for comparability with field applications. More realistic sensor models are therefore required. Two groups of sensor models are proposed on the basis of field and laboratory tests: one for specific sensors and another for a classification of sensor types to be used with the COST simulation benchmark environment. This should lead to a more realistic test environment and allow control engineers to define the requirements of the measuring equipment as a function of the selected control strategy.
Keywords
Subject (DDC)
Event
Exhibition start date
Exhibition end date
Conference start date
Conference end date
Date of the last check
ISBN
ISSN
0273-1223
1474-3876
1474-3876
Language
English
Created during FHNW affiliation
No
Strategic action fields FHNW
Publication status
Published
Review
Peer review of the complete publication
Open access category
Closed
License
Citation
Rieger, L., Alex, J., Winkler, S., Boehler, M., Thomann, M., & Siegrist, H. (2003). Progress in sensor technology - progress in process control? Part I: Sensor property investigation and classification. Water Science and Technology, 47(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0096