Nathan, Ganesh

Lade...
Profilbild
E-Mail-Adresse
Geburtsdatum
Projekt
Organisationseinheiten
Berufsbeschreibung
Nachname
Nathan
Vorname
Ganesh
Name
Nathan, Ganesh

Suchergebnisse

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 5 von 5
  • Publikation
    Innovation process and ethics in technology
    (09/2014) Nathan, Ganesh
    Technological Innovation, ethics and governance
    06 - Präsentation
  • Publikation
    Innovation Process and Ethics in Technology
    (06/2014) Nathan, Ganesh
    Innovation governance models, dealing in general with organizational structure, innovation process, strategy and leadership, are becoming increasingly important for innovative companies within the changing complexity of innovation ecosystems. Traditionally, governance is related to risk management and corporate governance is concerned with the rules and conduct of management to minimize risks to shareholders. With the increasing importance of ethical concerns and issues of governance in general, and in particular with technological innovations for responsible innovation (Owen et al., 2013), this paper focuses on the need for technological innovation processes to embed an ethical decision-making framework with a view to responsible innovation governance.
    06 - Präsentation
  • Publikation
    Technology and Ethics
    (01/2014) Nathan, Ganesh
    06 - Präsentation
  • Publikation
    Technological Innovation and Ethics
    (Globethics.net, 2014) Nathan, Ganesh; Bastos de Morais, Jean-Claude; Stückelberger, Christoph [in: Innovation Ethics: African and Global Perspectives]
    The aim of this article is to illuminate certain morally contentious links within technological innovation and to put forward some recommendations for ethical innovation.
    04A - Beitrag Sammelband
  • Publikation
    Multi-stakeholder Deliberation for (Global) Justice: An Approach from Modern Civic Republicanism
    (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014) Nathan, Ganesh; Schepers, Stefan; Kakabadse, Andrew [in: Rethinking the Future of Europe. A Challenge of Governance]
    Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSI) are important in dealing with (global) governance gaps in many dimensions – economic, ecological, social and cultural. However, their effectiveness is under scrutiny by both academics and practitioners. In this Chapter, Nathan attempts to derive the minimal and common conditions – freedom as non-domination, and recognition – for input justice on deliberation for MSI, critiquing liberal deliberative democracy and advocating modern civic republicanism. He further challenges the idea of the common good and invites us to consider the common concerns of the choices. This Chapter aims to encourage debate and discussion on the possibility and plausibility of innovating governance structures based on these minimal and common conditions for input justice for (global) multi-stakeholder deliberation.
    04A - Beitrag Sammelband