Safety over all? How European riders evaluate advanced cyclist assistance systems (ACAS) and their features

dc.contributor.authorUseche, Sergio A.
dc.contributor.authorO’Hern, Steve
dc.contributor.authorAlonso, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorSchaffner, Dorothea
dc.contributor.authorGené‐Morales, Javier
dc.contributor.authorMehdizadeh, Milad
dc.contributor.authorMøller, Mette
dc.contributor.authorNordfjærn, Trond
dc.contributor.authorSiebert, Felix Wilhelm
dc.contributor.authorStuder, Nora
dc.contributor.authorOviedo-Trespalacios, Óscar
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-17T12:43:40Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractAs cycling gains traction as a sustainable transport mode, enhancing cyclists' safety has become a key priority within European policy. Among the various developments introduced, Advanced Cyclist Assistance Systems (ACAS) stand out as a promising technological innovation. However, research on their perceived value and adoption remains limited, particularly regarding user preferences and demographic differences. Aim This study aimed to examine European cyclists' evaluation of five ACAS types and their core functional features, as well as to explore demographic differences, particularly in relation to cyclists' gender and age. Method This study used the data provided by 6167 cyclists (47.4% females; 51.5% males; 1.1% others) from 19 European countries. Participants provided self-reported evaluations of five ACAS types (environmental monitoring, rider visibility enhancement, real-time information, crash prevention-assistance, and post-crash appliances) along with key features (safety contribution, reliability, ease of use, novelty, and everyday need). Results Among ACAS types, visibility-enhancing systems (designed to increase cyclists' conspicuity) and environmental monitoring technologies received the highest valuations, while real-time information systems were rated the lowest. Safety contribution was the most highly valued attribute across all ACAS features. Additionally, gender differences were observed, with female cyclists prioritizing visibility and safety-related aspects. In contrast, male cyclists –while also favoring visibility-improving ACAS– placed greater emphasis on ease of use as a core feature. Conclusion These findings highlight the importance of user-centered ACAS design and suggest that broader adoption may depend on improving system reliability, regulatory frameworks, and alignment with cyclists' needs and attitudinal factors. Future research should explore real-world ACAS implementation and long-term adoption trends to support safer and more technologically integrated cycling environments.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.iatssr.2026.05.002
dc.identifier.issn0386-1112
dc.identifier.issn2210-4240
dc.identifier.urihttps://irf.fhnw.ch/handle/11645/57560
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26041/fhnw-16906
dc.issue2
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofIATSS Research
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc380 - Handel, Kommunikation, Verkehr
dc.titleSafety over all? How European riders evaluate advanced cyclist assistance systems (ACAS) and their features
dc.type01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
dc.volume50
dspace.entity.typePublication
fhnw.InventedHereYes
fhnw.ReviewTypepeer-reviewed
fhnw.openAccessCategoryGold
fhnw.pagination951-962
fhnw.publicationStatePublished
fhnw.targetcollectionf51a9aee-d96b-42fd-8670-90a6c92cb289
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1b9368e2-63d9-4ae1-8c15-695b4a8765b6
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione5ac13bd-4cbd-4ef5-899c-81a76144094e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1b9368e2-63d9-4ae1-8c15-695b4a8765b6
Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
1-s2.0-S0386111226000245-main.pdf
Größe:
2.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
2.66 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung: