Subarctic atmospheric aerosol composition. 3. Measured and modeled properties of cloud condensation nuclei

dc.contributor.authorKammermann, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorGysel, Martin
dc.contributor.authorWeingartner, Ernest
dc.contributor.authorHerich, Hanna
dc.contributor.authorCziczo, Daniel J.
dc.contributor.authorHolst, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSvenningsson, Birgitta
dc.contributor.authorArneth, Almut
dc.contributor.authorBaltensperger, Urs
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-13T12:02:23Z
dc.date.available2024-08-13T12:02:23Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-19
dc.description.abstractAerosol particles can modify cloud properties by acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Predicting CCN properties is still a challenge and not properly incorporated in current climate models. Atmospheric particle number size distributions, hygroscopic growth factors, and polydisperse CCN number concentrations were measured at the remote subarctic Stordalen mire, 200 km north of the Arctic Circle in northern Sweden. The CCN number concentration was highly variable, largely driven by variations in the total number of sufficiently large particles, though the variability of chemical composition was increasingly important for decreasing supersaturation. The hygroscopicity of particles measured by a hygroscopicity tandem differential mobility analyzer (HTDMA) was in agreement with large critical diameters observed for CCN activation (κ ≈ 0.07–0.21 for D = 50–200 nm). Size distribution and time‐ and size‐resolved HTDMA data were used to predict CCN number concentrations. Agreement of predictions with measured CCN within ±11% was achieved using parameterized Köhler theory and assuming a surface tension of pure water. The sensitivity of CCN predictions to various simplifying assumptions was further explored: We found that (1) ignoring particle mixing state did not affect CCN predictions, (2) averaging the HTDMA data in time with retaining the size dependence did not introduce a substantial bias, while individual predictions became more uncertain, and (3) predictions involving the hygroscopicity parameter recommended in literature for continental sites (κ ≈ 0.3 ± 0.1) resulted in a significant prediction bias. Future modeling studies should therefore at least aim at using averaged, size‐resolved, site‐specific hygroscopicity or chemical composition data for predictions of CCN number concentrations.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012447
dc.identifier.issn2169-8996
dc.identifier.issn2169-897X
dc.identifier.urihttps://irf.fhnw.ch/handle/11654/46645
dc.issueD4
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
dc.spatialHoboken
dc.subject.ddc550 - Geowissenschaften
dc.titleSubarctic atmospheric aerosol composition. 3. Measured and modeled properties of cloud condensation nuclei
dc.type01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
dc.volume115
dspace.entity.typePublication
fhnw.InventedHereNo
fhnw.ReviewTypeAnonymous ex ante peer review of a complete publication
fhnw.affiliation.hochschuleHochschule für Technikde_CH
fhnw.affiliation.institutlnstitut für Sensorik und Elektronikde_CH
fhnw.openAccessCategoryClosed
fhnw.publicationStatePublished
relation.isAuthorOfPublication54997bb8-cf4a-4120-b0c7-f8e731e8eea1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication05dd9a19-7a24-4325-805a-2d121483b168
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery05dd9a19-7a24-4325-805a-2d121483b168
Dateien
Lizenzbündel
Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
2.66 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung: