How statistical methods, hemispheric data and masking approaches shape probabilistic sweet spots in deep brain stimulation

dc.contributor.authorBucciarelli, Vittoria
dc.contributor.authorVogel, Dorian
dc.contributor.authorNordin, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorCoste, Jérôme
dc.contributor.authorLemaire, Jean-Jacques
dc.contributor.authorWårdell, Karin
dc.contributor.authorGuzman, Raphael
dc.contributor.authorHemm-Ode, Simone
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-01T11:25:01Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Probabilistic mapping is increasingly used to identify optimal stimulation regions (Probabilistic Sweet Spots, PSS) in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). Outcomes, however, depend on workflow parameters. This study examined how methodological and data-handling choices affect PSS stability and spatial consistency across varying sample sizes. METHODS: Intraoperative stimulation test data from 36 Parkinson's Disease patients were analyzed. PSS were computed across increasing sample sizes using four statistical approaches: Bayesian t-test (BAYES), Logistic Regression Model (LRM), Wilcoxon test with FDR correction (WFDR), and Wilcoxon test with permutation correction (WPERM). We assessed the effects of statistical tests, hemispheric data handling, and masking parameters (i.e., minimum number of patients and stimulations per voxel) on PSS stability and consistency, evaluated in terms of size and spatial location. RESULTS: BAYES was more robust at small to intermediate sample sizes, while WFDR and LRM stabilized only in larger cohorts (∼25-30 patients). WPERM consistently underperformed. Stability was higher in the left hemisphere. Combining hemispheres did not improve stability, suggesting asymmetries in stimulation effects. Masking parameters mainly affected PSS volume, with stricter thresholds reducing absolute size, but did not alter stability patterns. CONCLUSION: Statistical test choice, hemispheric analysis, and masking parameters strongly influence PSS outcomes. The Bayesian t-test is recommended for small to intermediate cohorts, and hemispheres should be analyzed separately to avoid masking clinically relevant asymmetries. SIGNIFICANCE: By highlighting the interplay between sample size, statistical methods, hemispheric data, and masking strategies, this work contributes to standardizing probabilistic mapping practices and improving their reliability for clinical translation.
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/tbme.2026.3690018
dc.identifier.issn0018-9294
dc.identifier.issn1558-2531
dc.identifier.urihttps://irf.fhnw.ch/handle/11645/56901
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIEEE
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
dc.rights.uri
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.titleHow statistical methods, hemispheric data and masking approaches shape probabilistic sweet spots in deep brain stimulation
dc.type01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
dspace.entity.typePublication
fhnw.InventedHereYes
fhnw.ReviewTypepeer-reviewed
fhnw.affiliation.hochschuleHochschule für Life Sciences FHNWde_CH
fhnw.affiliation.institutInstitut für Medizintechnik und Medizininformatikde_CH
fhnw.oastatus.auroraVersion: Accepted *** Embargo: None *** Licence: None *** URL: https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/3420
fhnw.openAccessCategoryClosed
fhnw.pagination1-8
fhnw.publicationStatePublished
fhnw.targetcollection7bbb4209-e450-4feb-ad5d-ea711f087e13
relation.isAuthorOfPublication98041bb5-1129-4b3b-a2b6-4c732aace7f9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8b7dc0ce-2f98-456c-8812-bc5836ea98b5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication751f4aee-97bb-4592-91f2-6e3e4623de25
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery98041bb5-1129-4b3b-a2b6-4c732aace7f9
Dateien

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
2.66 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung: