Surgical performance of 3D-printed polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants and titanium mesh in clinically matched orbital reconstruction. A cadaveric study
Loading...
Author (Corporation)
Publication date
2026
Type of student thesis
Course of study
Type
01A - Journal article
Editors
Editor (Corporation)
Supervisor
Parent work
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Special issue
DOI of the original publication
Link
Related research data
Series
Series number
Volume
19
Issue / Number
1
Pages / Duration
13-13
Patent number
Publisher / Publishing institution
MDPI
Place of publication / Event location
Edition
Version
Programming language
Assignee
Practice partner / Client
Abstract
Orbital reconstruction following trauma remains challenging due to complex three-dimensional (3D) anatomy and limited surgical access. While pre-fabricated titanium mesh is standard, it requires extensive intraoperative manipulation and produces imaging artifacts. The 3D-printed polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants (PSIs) offer potential advantages; however, limited data exists for the acceptance of PEEK PSIs by surgeons compared to other established techniques. Fourteen surgeons performed simulated orbital reconstructions on nine cadaveric heads comparing titanium mesh and the 3D-printed PEEK PSIs. Titanium mesh was used for Class II orbital floor fractures, while the 3D-printed PEEK PSIs (native and radiopaque formulations) were used for Class IV defects. Surgeons were blinded to the PEEK formulation type. Outcomes included operative efficiency, handling characteristics, fit quality, and mechanical stability using validated 5-point Likert scales and objective timing. The 3D-printed PEEK PSIs demonstrated faster procedure times (9.5 ± 5.3 vs. 11.2 ± 5.1 min) and superior fit quality (2.00 ± 1.04 vs. 2.18 ± 0.60) and mechanical stability (1.67 ± 0.49 vs. 1.91 ± 0.54), with 100% rated stable versus 91% for the titanium mesh. Surgeons could not distinguish between the native and radiopaque PEEK formulations. Most surgeons (64.3%) preferred situation-dependent material selection. The 3D-printed PEEK PSIs demonstrated advantages in handling, fit quality, and mechanical stability for complex defects, while the titanium mesh showed a lower learning curve for simple reconstructions. Radiopaque enhancement expands PEEK's clinical utility without compromising handling.
Keywords
Subject (DDC)
Event
Exhibition start date
Exhibition end date
Conference start date
Conference end date
Date of the last check
ISBN
ISSN
1943-3875
1943-3883
1943-3883
Language
English
Created during FHNW affiliation
Yes
Strategic action fields FHNW
Publication status
Published
Review
peer-reviewed
Open access category
Gold
License
Citation
Oteiza, J. Z., Haenggi, D., Krieger, Y. S., Schuebel, L., Seiler, D., Thieringer, F. M., & Sharma, N. (2026). Surgical performance of 3D-printed polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants and titanium mesh in clinically matched orbital reconstruction. A cadaveric study. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 19(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr19010013