All-inside meniscal repair devices compared with their matched inside-out Vertical mattress suture repair. Introducing 10,000 and 100,000 loading cycles

dc.contributor.authorRosso, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorBuckland, Daniel M.
dc.contributor.authorSchwenk, Tanja
dc.contributor.authorZimmermann, Simon
dc.contributor.authorde Wild, Michael
dc.contributor.authorValderrabano, Victor
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-13T13:05:39Z
dc.date.available2024-05-13T13:05:39Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-01
dc.description.abstractAll-inside arthroscopic meniscal repairs are favored by most clinicians because of their lower complication rate and decreased morbidity compared with inside-out techniques. Until now, only 1000 cycles have been used for biomechanical testing. Hypothesis: All-inside meniscal repairs will show inferior biomechanical response to cyclic loading (up to 100,000 cycles) and load-to-failure testing compared with inside-out suture controls. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Bucket-handle tears in 72 porcine menisci were repaired using the Omnispan and Fast-Fix 360 (all-inside devices) and Orthocord 2-0 and Ultrabraid 2-0 sutures (matched controls). Initial displacement, displacement after cyclic loading (100, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, 10,000, and 100,000 cycles) between 5 and 20 N, ultimate load to failure, and mode of failure were recorded, as well as stiffness. Results: Initial displacement and displacement after cyclic loading were not different between the groups. The Omnispan repair demonstrated the highest load-to-failure force (mean 6 SD, 151.3 6 21.5 N) and was significantly stronger than all the other constructs (Orthocord 2-0, 105.5 6 20.4 N; Ultrabraid 2-0, 93.4 6 22.5 N; Fast-Fix 360, 76.6 6 14.2 N) (P \ .0001 for all). The Orthocord vertical inside-out mattress repair was significantly stronger than the Fast-Fix 360 repair (P = .003). The Omnispan (30.8 6 3.5 N/mm) showed significantly higher stiffness compared with the Ultrabraid 2-0 (22.9 6 6.9 N/mm, P \ .0001) and Fast-Fix 360 (23.7 6 3.9 N/mm, P = .001). The predominant mode of failure was suture failure. Conclusion: All-inside meniscal devices show comparable biomechanical properties compared with inside-out suture repair in cyclic loading, even after 100,000 cycles. Clinical Relevance: Eight to 10 weeks of rehabilitation might not pose a problem for all repairs in this worst-case scenario.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0363546514538394
dc.identifier.issn0363-5465
dc.identifier.issn1552-3365
dc.identifier.urihttps://irf.fhnw.ch/handle/11654/45800
dc.issue9
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE
dc.relation.ispartofThe American Journal of Sports Medicine
dc.subjectAll-inside
dc.subjectBiomechanical testing
dc.subjectBiomechanics
dc.subjectFast-Fix 360
dc.subjectMeniscus
dc.subjectOmnispan
dc.subjectOrthocord
dc.subjectRepair
dc.subjectUltrabraid
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften
dc.titleAll-inside meniscal repair devices compared with their matched inside-out Vertical mattress suture repair. Introducing 10,000 and 100,000 loading cycles
dc.type01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
dc.volume42
dspace.entity.typePublication
fhnw.InventedHereYes
fhnw.ReviewTypeAnonymous ex ante peer review of a complete publication
fhnw.affiliation.hochschuleHochschule für Life Sciences FHNWde_CH
fhnw.affiliation.institutInstitut für Medizintechnik und Medizininformatikde_CH
fhnw.openAccessCategoryClosed
fhnw.pagination2226 - 2233
fhnw.publicationStatePublished
relation.isAuthorOfPublication135938a9-969d-4ea3-9bb2-7ff1d77554cb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery135938a9-969d-4ea3-9bb2-7ff1d77554cb
Dateien

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Kein Vorschaubild vorhanden
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
1.36 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung: