Auflistung nach Autor:in "Buser, Daniela"
Gerade angezeigt 1 - 13 von 13
- Treffer pro Seite
- Sortieroptionen
Publikation Arbeitsdauern bei der visuellen Inspektion von Gepäckröntgenbildern(05.03.2021) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation Effects of time on task, breaks, and target prevalence on screener performance in an X-ray image inspection task(2019) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian; John, MalaCurrently, it is not clear how long security officers can maintain their performance when inspecting X-ray images of passenger bags for prohibited items. New technologies and working environments in airport security screening could profit from longer screening durations, and they might also facilitate performance upkeep. In our study, two groups of security officers conducted a one-hour simulated cabin baggage screening task. One group took 10-minute breaks every 20 minutes; the other worked continuously. Both groups worked under two different target prevalence conditions. Results showed a shift in response tendency that developed at the beginning of the task. Moreover, security officers were able to maintain their visual inspection performance over the course of one hour. There was no difference in performance between the group with breaks and the group without breaks. These results lay the groundwork for further testing longer screening durations in the field.04B - Beitrag KonferenzschriftPublikation The effects of workload and time on task on detection performance in X-ray cabin baggage screening(21.04.2022) Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sterchi, Yanik06 - PräsentationPublikation Einfluss von Arbeitsdauer und Pausen auf die Leistung von Sicherheitsbeauftragten während 60 Minuten Röntgenbildanalyse von Handgepäck(03.03.2020) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation Feldstudie zur aktuellen EU-Verordnung bzgl. der Arbeitsdauern bei der visuellen Inspektion von Gepäckröntgenbildern - Teil 2(03.03.2022) Sterchi, Yanik; Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation Field study regarding the work duration for the visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage(06.09.2022) Sterchi, Yanik; Buser, Daniela; Sauer, Juergen; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation Field study regarding the work duration for the visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage(21.03.2022) Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sterchi, Yanik06 - PräsentationPublikation Field study: Time on task for X-ray screening of cabin baggage(10/2021) Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sterchi, Yanik06 - PräsentationPublikation Remote Cabin Baggage Screening – Time-on-Task(15.11.2018) Sterchi, Yanik; Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation Time on task and detection performance in cabin baggage X-ray screening(24.11.2020) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners(Elsevier, 17.05.2023) Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sauer, Jürgen; Sterchi, Yanik01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher ZeitschriftPublikation Why stop after 20 minutes? Breaks and target prevalence in a 60-minute X-ray baggage screening task(Elsevier, 03/2020) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, AdrianCurrent EU regulation restricts continuously reviewing X-ray images of passenger baggage to 20-min duration as a precautionary measure to prevent performance decrements in airport security officers (screeners). However, this 20-min limit is not based on clear empirical evidence on how well screeners can sustain their performance over time. Our study tested screeners in a 60-min simulated X-ray cabin baggage screening task. One group took 10-min breaks after 20 min of screening; the other group worked without breaks. We found no decrease in performance over 60 min in either group. Breaks did not affect performance, but they did reduce the amount of subjective distress. By varying target prevalence, we found that da with a slope of about 0.6 is a more valid measure of detection performance than d’. Target prevalence caused a criterion shift. Our results provide a basis for conducting field studies of prolonged screening durations, and open the discussion on whether more flexible break policies and work schedules should be considered.01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
