Lindeque, Johan Paul

Profilbild
E-Mail-Adresse
Geburtsdatum
Projekt
Organisationseinheiten
Berufsbeschreibung
Nachname
Lindeque
Vorname
Johan Paul
Name
Lindeque, Johan Paul

Filter

2007 - 20092
Filter zurücksetzen

Einstellungen

Autor:in: McGuire, Steven × Enddatum: 2009 ×

Suchergebnisse

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 2 von 2
  • Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
    Publikation
    Multilateralism and the Multinational Enterprise
    (Cambridge University Press, 2009) Lawton, Thomas; Lindeque, Johan Paul; McGuire, Steven [in: Business and Politics]
    How do multilateral institutions influence the strategic choices and actions of international managers? This paper addresses the question by exploring the impact of the World Trade Organization's (WTO) decision-making process on multinational enterprises (MNEs). We discuss the three phases of the WTO decision-making lifecycle - the formulation of trade rules, the implementation of those rules, and the enforcement of the rules and propose a strategic adjustment framework for understanding how companies alter their strategies and structures in response to the WTO's rules and operations. We argue that the increased relevance of multilateral rules and enforcement mechanisms embodied in the WTO - is an important influence on MNE strategies and structures because of the increasing embeddedness of the WTO in national levels of regulation. We illustrate this through examples taken from the pharmaceutical, textiles and sugar industries sectors that have witnessed substantial multilateral regulation.
    01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
  • Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
    Publikation
    The United States and Trade Disputes in the World Trade Organization: Hegemony Constrained or Confirmed?
    (Springer, 2007) Lindeque, Johan Paul; McGuire, Steven [in: Management International Review]
    Does the World Trade Organization function to reinforce American dominance (or hegemony) of the world economy? We examine this question via an analysis of trade disputes involving the United States. This allows us to assess whether the US does better than other countries in this judicialised forum: and in so doing enhance the competitive prospects of their firms. The results are equivocal. The United States does best in the early phases of a dispute, where political power is important. It does less well as the process develops.
    01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift