Seiler, Daniel

Profilbild
E-Mail-Adresse
Geburtsdatum
Projekt
Organisationseinheiten
Berufsbeschreibung
Nachname
Seiler
Vorname
Daniel
Name
Seiler, Daniel

Filter

2021 - 20233
Filter zurücksetzen

Einstellungen

Autor:in: Sharma, Neha ×

Suchergebnisse

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 3 von 3
  • Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
    Publikation
    Parameter optimization in a finite element mandibular fracture fixation model using the design of experiments approach
    (Elsevier, 08/2023) Maintz, Michaela; Msallem, Bilal; de Wild, Michael; Seiler, Daniel; Herrmann, Sven; Feiler, Stefanie; Sharma, Neha; Dalcanale, Federico; Cattin, Philippe; Thieringer, Florian Markus [in: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials]
    01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
  • Vorschaubild
    Publikation
    Effect of printing parameters on mechanical performance of material-extrusion 3D-printed PEEK specimens at the point-of-care
    (MDPI, 17.01.2023) Zarean, Paridokht; Zarean, Parichehr; de Wild, Michael; Thieringer, Florian M.; Sharma, Neha; Seiler, Daniel; Malgaroli, Patrick [in: Applied Sciences]
    Additive manufacturing (AM) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) biomaterials using the material-extrusion (MEX) method has been studied for years. Because of the challenging manufacturing process, precisely controlling printing parameters is crucial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of printing parameters such as orientation and position of printing on mechanical properties. Thus, 34 samples were printed using PEEK filament and the MEX process. Samples were divided into two main groups (A,B) according to their printing orientations (A: groups 1–3) and positions on the build plate (B: groups 4–8). Mechanical tensile tests were performed to evaluate the effects of different printing orientations and positions on mechanical properties. The means of the tensile modulus in samples 3D-printed in XY (group 1), XZ (group 2), and ZX (group 3) orientations were not significantly different (p-value = 0.063). Groups 1 and 2 had smaller distributions than group 3 in the means of tensile strength. The t-test showed that the overall means of the measurements in groups 4–8 did not differ significantly (p-value = 0.315). The tensile tests indicated that printing in vertical and horizontal orientations had no significant influence on mechanical properties. There were no significant differences in mechanical strength between top/bottom printed samples in five different lateral positions. Reliability of printing with good mechanical properties could be a step forward to manufacturing patient-specific implants.
    01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
  • Vorschaubild
    Publikation
    Quantitative assessment of point-of-care 3D-printed patient-specific polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranial implants
    (MDPI, 07.08.2021) Seiler, Daniel; Dalcanale, Federico; Sharma, Neha; Aghlmandi, Soheila; Zeilhofer, Hans-Florian; Thieringer, Florian; Honigmann, Philipp [in: International Journal of Molecular Sciences]
    Recent advancements in medical imaging, virtual surgical planning (VSP), and three-dimensional (3D) printing have potentially changed how today’s craniomaxillofacial surgeons use patient information for customized treatments. Over the years, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has emerged as the biomaterial of choice to reconstruct craniofacial defects. With advancements in additive manufacturing (AM) systems, prospects for the point-of-care (POC) 3D printing of PEEK patient-specific implants (PSIs) have emerged. Consequently, investigating the clinical reliability of POC-manufactured PEEK implants has become a necessary endeavor. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a quantitative assessment of POC-manufactured, 3D-printed PEEK PSIs for cranial reconstruction through characterization of the geometrical, morphological, and biomechanical aspects of the in-hospital 3D-printed PEEK cranial implants. The study results revealed that the printed customized cranial implants had high dimensional accuracy and repeatability, displaying clinically acceptable morphologic similarity concerning fit and contours continuity. From a biomechanical standpoint, it was noticed that the tested implants had variable peak load values with discrete fracture patterns and failed at a mean (SD) peak load of 798.38 ± 211.45 N. In conclusion, the results of this preclinical study are in line with cranial implant expectations; however, specific attributes have scope for further improvements.
    01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift