Schwaninger, Adrian
E-Mail-Adresse
Geburtsdatum
Projekt
Organisationseinheiten
Berufsbeschreibung
Nachname
Vorname
Name
Suchergebnisse
Job demands, job resources, strain, motivation, and turnover intention
2024-11-13, Merks, Sarah, Latscha, Marius, Theiler, Sven, Sterchi, Yanik, Schwaninger, Adrian
Belastungen und Ressourcen und ihre Auswirkungen auf Beanspruchung, Wohlbefinden und Kündigungsabsicht - Eine Studie mit Flughafensicherheitsbeauftragten
2024-03-08, Latscha, Marius, Theiler, Sven, Sterchi, Yanik, Schwaninger, Adrian
The effects of workload and time on task on detection performance in X-ray cabin baggage screening
2022-04-21, Buser, Daniela, Schwaninger, Adrian, Sterchi, Yanik
Human factors considerations in semi-automation
2024-11-13, Sterchi, Yanik, Merks, Sarah, Schwaninger, Adrian
Objektlernen mit Virtual Reality versus am 2D Bildschirm
2024-03-07, Wyssenbach, Thomas, Kaufmann, Kaspar, Schwaninger, Adrian
Benefits of decision support systems in relation to task difficulty in airport security X-ray screening
2022-08-15, Hügli, David, Merks, Sarah, Schwaninger, Adrian
Automated explosive detection systems for cabin baggage screening (EDSCB) highlight areas in X-ray images of passenger bags that could contain explosive material. Several countries have implemented EDSCB so that passengers can leave personal electronic devices in their cabin bag- gage. This increases checkpoint efficiency, but also task difficulty for screeners. We used this case to investigate whether the benefits of decision support systems depend on task difficulty. 100 pro- fessional screeners conducted a simulated baggage screening task. They had to detect prohibited articles built into personal electronic devices that were screened either separately (low task diffi- culty) or inside baggage (high task difficulty). Results showed that EDSCB increased the detection of bombs built into personal electronic devices when screened separately. When electronics were left inside the baggage, operators ignored many EDSCB alarms, and many bombs were missed. Moreover, screeners missed most unalarmed explosives because they over-relied on the EDSCB’s judgment. We recommend that when EDSCB indicates that the bag might contain an explosive, baggage should always be examined further in a secondary search using explosive trace detection, manual opening of bags and other means
The occurrence of miscues by decision support systems. A study with airport security screeners supported by automated explosives detection systems for cabin baggage screening
2022-04-21, Hügli, David, Chavaillaz, Alain, Sauer, Juergen, Schwaninger, Adrian