Perceived risk and benefit of nuclear waste repositories: Four opinion clusters
No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Author (Corporation)
Publication date
2012
Typ of student thesis
Course of study
Type
01A - Journal article
Editors
Editor (Corporation)
Supervisor
Parent work
Risk Analysis
Special issue
DOI of the original publication
Link
Series
Series number
Volume
33
Issue / Number
6
Pages / Duration
1038-1048
Patent number
Publisher / Publishing institution
Wiley
Place of publication / Event location
Edition
Version
Programming language
Assignee
Practice partner / Client
Abstract
Local public resistance can block the site‐selection process, construction, and operation of nuclear waste repositories. Social science has established that the perception of risks and benefits, trust in authorities, and opinion on nuclear energy play important roles in acceptance. In particular, risk and benefit evaluations seem critical for opinion formation. However, risks and benefits have rarely been studied independently and, most often, the focus has been on the two most salient groups of proponents and opponents. The aim of this exploratory study is to examine the often‐neglected majority of people holding ambivalent or indifferent opinions. We used cluster analysis to examine the sample (N = 500, mailed survey in German‐speaking Switzerland) in terms of patterns of risk and benefit perception. We reveal four significantly different and plausible clusters: one cluster with high‐benefit ratings in favor of a repository and one cluster with high‐risk ratings opposing it; a third cluster shows ambivalence, with high ratings on both risk and benefit scales and moderate opposition, whereas a fourth cluster seems indifferent, rating risks and benefits only moderately compared to the ambivalent cluster. We conclude that a closer look at the often neglected but considerable number of people with ambivalent or indifferent opinions is necessary. Although the extreme factions of the public will most probably not change their opinion, we do not yet know how the opinion of the ambivalent and indifferent clusters might develop over time.
Keywords
Subject (DDC)
150 - Psychologie
Event
Exhibition start date
Exhibition end date
Conference start date
Conference end date
Date of the last check
ISBN
ISSN
0272-4332
1539-6924
1539-6924
Language
English
Created during FHNW affiliation
No
Strategic action fields FHNW
Publication status
Published
Review
Peer review of the complete publication
Open access category
Closed
License
Citation
SEIDL, Roman, Corinne MOSER, Michael STAUFFACHER und Pius KRÜTLI, 2012. Perceived risk and benefit of nuclear waste repositories: Four opinion clusters. Risk Analysis. 2012. Bd. 33, Nr. 6, S. 1038–1048. DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01897.x. Verfügbar unter: https://irf.fhnw.ch/handle/11654/38985