Single-view, multi-view and 3D imaging for baggage screening: What should be considered for effective training?
No Thumbnail Available
Author (Corporation)
Publication date
02/2019
Typ of student thesis
Course of study
Collections
Type
01B - Magazine or newspaper article
Editors
Editor (Corporation)
Supervisor
Parent work
Aviation Security International
Special issue
DOI of the original publication
Link
Series
Series number
Volume
Issue / Number
Pages / Duration
32-35
Patent number
Publisher / Publishing institution
ASI Publications
Place of publication / Event location
Edition
Version
Programming language
Assignee
Practice partner / Client
Abstract
X-ray screening of passenger baggage is conducted at airports worldwide to prevent terrorist attacks and other acts of unlawful interference against civil aviation. Whether or not prohibited items are detected under X-ray examination depends both on the technology deployed and on human factors. While single-view imaging has been used for decades to screen passenger baggage, newer technology is based on multi-view and 3D imaging with automated explosives detection. However, the best equipment is of limited value if the humans who operate it are not trained appropriately. Thus, what should be considered for training to be effective when single-view, multi-view or 3D imaging is used for passenger baggage screening? In this article, Adrian Schwaninger and Sarah Merks provide recommendations for cabin baggage and hold baggage screening based on scientific studies conducted with screeners over the last 15 years.
Keywords
Subject (DDC)
Event
Exhibition start date
Exhibition end date
Conference start date
Conference end date
Date of the last check
ISBN
ISSN
1352-0148
Language
English
Created during FHNW affiliation
Yes
Strategic action fields FHNW
Publication status
Published
Review
Expert editing/editorial review
Open access category
License
Citation
SCHWANINGER, Adrian und Sarah MERKS, 2019. Single-view, multi-view and 3D imaging for baggage screening: What should be considered for effective training? Aviation Security International. Februar 2019. S. 32–35. Verfügbar unter: http://hdl.handle.net/11654/27819