Barriers and facilitators to the use of virtual wards: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence
Lade...
Autor:in (Körperschaft)
Publikationsdatum
07.2025
Typ der Arbeit
Studiengang
Sammlung
Typ
01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
Herausgeber:innen
Herausgeber:in (Körperschaft)
Betreuer:in
Übergeordnetes Werk
The International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Themenheft
DOI der Originalpublikation
Link
Reihe / Serie
Reihennummer
Jahrgang / Band
37
Ausgabe / Nummer
3
Seiten / Dauer
Patentnummer
Verlag / Herausgebende Institution
Oxford University Press
Verlagsort / Veranstaltungsort
Auflage
Version
Programmiersprache
Abtretungsempfänger:in
Praxispartner:in/Auftraggeber:in
Zusammenfassung
Background
Virtual wards offer an alternative to traditional inpatient care, delivering acute care, monitoring, and treatment at home to prevent hospital admissions or facilitate early discharge. The aim of our qualitative systematic review was to understand the barriers to and facilitators for the successful implementation and sustainability of virtual wards from the perspective of any involved stakeholder, using behavioural change models.
Methods
The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024519627). The following databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete. A three-stage deductive content analysis, as recommended for applying the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation–Behaviour) model and TDF (Theoretical Domains Framework) to qualitative data, was conducted to categorize and map the barriers and facilitators to virtual wards identified in the included studies, using the TDF domains as a guiding framework.
Results
Searches initially identified 7489 articles. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Common barriers for patients and family members were a lack of language skills, technical skills, and medical knowledge. Caregivers were also required to take on significant medical responsibilities, while patients had to remain self-motivated. The introduction of appropriate training was seen as a valuable facilitator. Healthcare providers faced numerous technological barriers that had the potential to affect care delivery. Strong leadership was an essential facilitator for effective care coordination in virtual wards. From a healthcare system perspective, the availability of resources — such as staffing, equipment, and funding —along with standardized protocols, is crucial for the successful implementation of virtual wards.
Conclusions
Virtual wards can ease hospital capacity issues and support the delivery of safe and effective care in patients’ own homes. However, to realize this potential, we must understand the barriers to, and facilitators of, the use and successful implementation of virtual wards for patients, carers, and healthcare professionals. This understanding will allow targeted strategies and interventions to be developed to support both the delivery and receipt of care on virtual wards.
Schlagwörter
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Veranstaltung
Startdatum der Ausstellung
Enddatum der Ausstellung
Startdatum der Konferenz
Enddatum der Konferenz
Datum der letzten Prüfung
ISBN
ISSN
1353-4505
1464-3677
1464-3677
Sprache
Englisch
Während FHNW Zugehörigkeit erstellt
Ja
Zukunftsfelder FHNW
Future Health
Publikationsstatus
Veröffentlicht
Begutachtung
Peer-Review der ganzen Publikation
Open Access-Status
Hybrid
Lizenz
Zitation
Cucurachi, S., Lydon, S., Moens, L., Manser, T., & O’Connor, P. (2025). Barriers and facilitators to the use of virtual wards: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence. The International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf065