Understanding clinicians’ perspectives on end-of-life dreams and visions. An international survey
Lade...
Autor:in (Körperschaft)
Publikationsdatum
2026
Typ der Arbeit
Studiengang
Typ
01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
Herausgeber:innen
Herausgeber:in (Körperschaft)
Betreuer:in
Übergeordnetes Werk
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Themenheft
DOI der Originalpublikation
Link
Zugehörige Forschungsdaten
Reihe / Serie
Reihennummer
Jahrgang / Band
Ausgabe / Nummer
Seiten / Dauer
10966218261463311-10966218261463311
Patentnummer
Verlag / Herausgebende Institution
Mary Ann Liebert
Verlagsort / Veranstaltungsort
Auflage
Version
Programmiersprache
Abtretungsempfänger:in
Praxispartner:in/Auftraggeber:in
Zusammenfassung
Background:
End-of-life dreams and visions (ELDVs) are vivid, often subjective experiences that occur during the dying process. Even though the patient and family experiences of ELDVs are well documented, there is limited knowledge regarding the perspectives, preparedness, and perceived needs of health care professionals. ELDVs also remain insufficiently addressed in clinical care.
Objective:
To describe how frequently clinicians encounter ELDVs, perceived preparedness/training, and approaches to clinician and family education and communication.
Methods:
We conducted a survey to explore health care professional’s perspectives and experiences surrounding ELDVs. The Checklist for Reporting Results of internet E-Surveys was followed. Our survey included 30 items across 7 sections. Professionals that take care of patients with serious or terminal illness were eligible for the study. We utilized a structured multimodal dissemination to achieve maximum diversity in participants.
Results:
Briefly, 247 participants were eligible for analysis. Frequent encounters for ELDVs were reported by participants. Participants perceived positive effects on patients more frequently than negative effects (W = 446.0, p < 0.001, r = 0.64). Clinical challenges were rated differently across categories (χ 2 = 160.97, p < 0.001, Kendall’s W = 0.13). The most commonly endorsed clinical challenges were lack of institutional protocols and lack of standardized diagnostic criteria, both rated significantly higher than all other challenges (Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon tests: All p < 0.001). Participants endorsed multidisciplinary involvement and formal policy implementation.
Conclusion:
ELDVs are common, but clinicians feel underprepared to respond to them. There is a need for structured training and institutional protocols. Future studies should include patients and their families and analyze how their experiences are shaped by physician responses.
Schlagwörter
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Veranstaltung
Startdatum der Ausstellung
Enddatum der Ausstellung
Startdatum der Konferenz
Enddatum der Konferenz
Datum der letzten Prüfung
ISBN
ISSN
1096-6218
1557-7740
1557-7740
Sprache
Englisch
Während FHNW Zugehörigkeit erstellt
Ja
Zukunftsfelder FHNW
Publikationsstatus
Veröffentlicht
Begutachtung
peer-reviewed
Open Access-Status
Closed
Zitation
Hamza Habib, M., Fontanesi, L., Motiwala, Z. Y., Cöltekin, A., Misra, S., MacLullich, A., Vinay, R., Hertler, C., Blum, D., Singler, K., Simões, C., Frisardi, V., Boccardi, V., Bellelli, G., Koca, M., Kerr, C. W., Jones, C. A., Peng-Keller, S., & Schlögl, M. (2026). Understanding clinicians’ perspectives on end-of-life dreams and visions. An international survey. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 10966218261463311–10966218261463311. https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218261463311