Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorLindeque, Johan Paul
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, Steven
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T13:14:05Z
dc.date.available2015-12-08T13:14:05Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1011-6702
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11654/11631
dc.description.abstractThe study investigates the prosecution of US trade remedy cases as examples of administrative government agency investigations and seeks to identify key capabilities for effective corporate political strategy targeting these institutions. Trade remedy cases are important policy tools, designed to protect domestic firms from ‘unfair’ import competition. The research contributes to the growing literature on corporate political activity and its links with superior outcomes in the marketplace. Three capabilities are identified: the capability to collect market/non-market intelligence, the capability to build and shape the administrative record, and the capability to align business practice with the US trade remedy institutions.
dc.description.urihttp://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=TRAD2010035
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of World Trade
dc.accessRightsAnonymous
dc.titleNonmarket Capabilities and the Prosecution of Trade Remedy Cases in the United States
dc.type01 - Zeitschriftenartikel, Journalartikel oder Magazin
dc.volume44
dc.issue4
dc.audienceScience
fhnw.publicationStatePublished
fhnw.ReviewTypeAnonymous ex ante peer review of a complete publication
fhnw.InventedHereNo
fhnw.PublishedSwitzerlandNo
fhnw.pagination903-930
fhnw.IsStudentsWorkno


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

DateienGrösseFormatAnzeige

Zu diesem Eintrag gibt es keine Dateien.

Der Eintrag erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige