FHNW Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz
  • Startseite
  • Publikationen
  • Projekte
  • Studentische Arbeiten
  • de
  •  Login
Eintraganzeige 
  •   IRF Home
  • Hochschule für Angewandte Psychologie
  • Institut Mensch in komplexen Systemen
  • Eintraganzeige
  • Hochschule für Angewandte Psychologie
  • Institut Mensch in komplexen Systemen
  • Eintraganzeige
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Expertise, automation and trust in X-ray screening of cabin baggage

Autor/Autorin
Chavaillaz, Alain
Schwaninger, Adrian
Michel, Stefan
Sauer, Jürgen
Datum
2019
Metadata
Zur Langanzeige
Type
01 - Zeitschriftenartikel, Journalartikel oder Magazin
Zusammenfassung
X-ray screening of passenger baggage is a key component in aviation security. The current study investigated how experts and novices performed in an X-ray baggage screening task while being assisted by an adaptable diagnostic aid. Furthermore, it examined how both groups operated and trusted this automated system. 30 experts (certified screeners) and 31 novices (students) had to indicate whether a target item (either a knife or a gun) was present in a series of X-ray images of cabin baggage. Half of the participants could choose between three different support levels of the diagnostic aid (DA): (1) no support, (2) a cue indicating the presence of a potential target without locating it, or (3) a cue indicating the presence of a potential target by surrounding it with a red frame. As expected, experts achieved higher detection performance (d’), were more self-confident and felt more competent in achieving the task than novices. Fur-thermore, experts experienced less time pressure and fatigue. Although both groups used the DA in a comparable way (in terms of support level used and frequency of level switches), re-sults showed a performance increase for novices working with the DA compared to novices without support. This benefit of DA was not observed for experts. Interestingly, despite no differ-ence in perceived trust ratings, experts were more compliant (i.e., following DA recommenda-tions when it indicated the presence of a target) and reliant (i.e., following DA recommendations when it indicated the absence of a target) than novices. Altogether, the results of the present study suggested that novices benefited more from a DA than experts. Furthermore, compliance and reliance on DA seemed to depend on expertise with the task. Since experts should be bet-ter at assessing the reliability of the DA than novices, they may have used the DA as ‘back-up’ to confirm their decisions based on expertise (confirmatory function), while novices may have used it as a guide to base their decisions on (support function). Finally, trust towards a DA was associated with the degree to which participants found the DA useful.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11654/27822
DOI der Originalausgabe
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00256
Übergeordnetes Werk
Frontiers in Psychology
Jahrgang
10
Seiten
1-11
Zitation

Stöbern

Gesamter BestandBereiche & SammlungenErscheinungsdatumAutoren/AutorinnenTitelThemenDiese SammlungErscheinungsdatumAutoren/AutorinnenTitelThemen

Mein Benutzerkonto

EinloggenRegistrieren
Erweiterter Export: CSVErweiterter Export: RISErweiterter Export: BibTeX

Kontakt

Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz FHNW
Vizepräsidium Hochschulentwicklung
Bahnhofstrasse 6
5210 Windisch

E-Mail: irf@fhnw.ch

Über das IRF

Das IRF ist das digitale Repositorium der Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz FHNW. Es enthält Publikationen, studentische Arbeiten und Projekte.

Links

IRF Handbuch
Liste der IRF Power User
Feedbackformular

www.fhnw.ch | Impressum | Datenschutz | Urheberrecht | IRF-Reglement