Ibach, Merle

Lade...
Profilbild
E-Mail-Adresse
Geburtsdatum
Projekt
Organisationseinheiten
Berufsbeschreibung
Nachname
Ibach
Vorname
Merle
Name
Ibach, Merle

Suchergebnisse

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 4 von 4
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Publikation

Making a Cup – An autoethnographic study on the domain of making and its distinction from designing

2021, Ibach, Merle, Christensen, Michelle, Michel, Ralf, Jonas, Wolfgang

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Publikation

Unmaking – against general applicability

2020, Bedö, Viktor, Ibach, Merle, Büsse, Michaela, Gerloff, Felix, Miyazaki, Shintaro, Allen, Jamie, Bogers, Loes, Chiappini, Letizia

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Publikation

Digital Tools for Collaborative Design Processes

2021, Greiner-Petter, Moritz, Ibach, Merle, Zürich, Swiss Design Network

Diverse practices of collaboration in design, research, teaching, or academia increasingly rely on digital online tools to facilitate processes of working and creating together. But a lot of the available digital platforms are not necessarily designed with the particular needs of these respective practices in mind. Rather, they might focus on commercial contexts, be built on limiting assumptions about work practices and collaboration, or simply lack capabilities for a substantial support of specific knowledge and creative practices within more diverse collaborative settings. In this paper, we take an exemplary look at three widely-used digital collaboration tools and their capacities and limitations to support collaborative design processes in particular. We aim to highlight a few of their embedded dispositions and built-in understandings of collaboration, creativity or productivity and suggest some aspirations for alternative designs.

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Publikation

Unmaking. Against General Applicability

2020, Allen, Jamie, Ibach, Merle, Büsse, Michaela, Gerloff, Felix, Bedö, Viktor, Miyazaki, Shintaro, Bogers, Loes, Chiappini, Letizia

As belief in the applicability and efficacy of DIY production, open-source, and method sharing has broadened to include institutional hackathons and open-data-fueled and civic 'maker weekends', taking stock and articulating how certain approaches 'work' or 'do not work' within maker culture – and for progressive and expansive creator cultures more generally – continues to be essential. 'Making' is a key concept that frames a host of more specific practices, lending characteristic manual/moral, communal/communicational, aesthetic/ethical, and enacted/ economic inflections and values. Even simple historical, traditional, technological, or digital acts of object and media creation, of art and design, but also of writing and thinking itself, can be recast as 'making'. What is it that happens to the thinking and doing of such activities, when such recasting is desired, chosen, projected, enforced, or assumed?