Affect or information? Examining drivers of public preferences of future energy portfolios in Switzerland
No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Author (Corporation)
Publication date
2019
Typ of student thesis
Course of study
Type
01A - Journal article
Editors
Editor (Corporation)
Supervisor
Parent work
Energy Research & Social Science
Special issue
DOI of the original publication
Link
Series
Series number
Volume
52
Issue / Number
Pages / Duration
20-29
Patent number
Publisher / Publishing institution
Elsevier
Place of publication / Event location
Edition
Version
Programming language
Assignee
Practice partner / Client
Abstract
The energy transition in Switzerland, as in many other countries, aims to increase the proportion of electricity produced using renewable energy technologies. In this context, governmental agencies and other institutions have attempted to communicate the implications of (domestic) electricity systems through the use of web-based and interactive decision support systems (DSSs). Studies show that, when no additional information is provided, preferences concerning the future electricity mix are mainly driven by the affective reactions that energy technologies evoke. A question remains, however, regarding how people engage with the information provided in a DSS, as well as whether such information is influential in terms of shaping people’s choices. We asked our participants to build an electricity portfolio using a DSS, which modeled the Swiss electricity system. The participants’ political orientation and their affective reactions to different energy technologies guided their information search, as well as the choice of energy technologies within their portfolio. The attention paid to the information provided was not directly related to the participants’ portfolio choices. The selective processing of information, which was based on the participants’ prior attitudes, suggests that they target information they are already familiar with in the DSS. However, this also illustrates a caveat previously identified in motivated political reasoning, since selective information processing, together with the tendency to disconfirm information that is incongruent with prior beliefs, can lead to the polarization of previously held views. As the information provided through the DSS we tested was unable to change the participants’ affective-cognitive evaluation of energy technologies, its use should be carefully considered in light of the possible effects of consolidating existing beliefs.
Keywords
Subject (DDC)
334 - Natürliche Ressourcen, Energie und Umwelt
150 - Psychologie
150 - Psychologie
Event
Exhibition start date
Exhibition end date
Conference start date
Conference end date
Date of the last check
ISBN
ISSN
2214-6296
2214-6326
2214-6326
Language
English
Created during FHNW affiliation
Yes
Strategic action fields FHNW
Publication status
Published
Review
Peer review of the complete publication
Open access category
License
Citation
JOBIN, Marilou, Vivianne VISSCHERS, Joseph ARVAI und Michael SIEGRIST, 2019. Affect or information? Examining drivers of public preferences of future energy portfolios in Switzerland. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019. Bd. 52, S. 20–29. DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.016. Verfügbar unter: http://hdl.handle.net/11654/27386