Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers. result of two intercomparison workshops
Dateien
Autor:in (Körperschaft)
Publikationsdatum
2011
Typ der Arbeit
Studiengang
Typ
01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
Herausgeber:innen
Herausgeber:in (Körperschaft)
Betreuer:in
Übergeordnetes Werk
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Themenheft
DOI der Originalpublikation
Link
Reihe / Serie
Reihennummer
Jahrgang / Band
4
Ausgabe / Nummer
2
Seiten / Dauer
245-268
Patentnummer
Verlag / Herausgebende Institution
Copernicus
Verlagsort / Veranstaltungsort
Göttingen
Auflage
Version
Programmiersprache
Abtretungsempfänger:in
Praxispartner:in/Auftraggeber:in
Zusammenfassung
Absorption photometers for real time application have been available since the 1980s, but the use of filter-based instruments to derive information on aerosol properties (absorption coefficient and black carbon, BC) is still a matter of debate. Several workshops have been conducted to investigate the performance of individual instruments over the intervening years. Two workshops with large sets of aerosol absorption photometers were conducted in 2005 and 2007. The data from these instruments were corrected using existing methods before further analysis. The inter-comparison shows a large variation between the responses to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments. The unit to unit variability between instruments can be up to 30% for Particle Soot Absorption Photometers (PSAPs) and Aethalometers. Multi Angle Absorption Photometers (MAAPs) showed a variability of less than 5%. Reasons for the high variability were identified to be variations in sample flow and spot size. It was observed that different flow rates influence system performance with respect to response to absorption and instrumental noise. Measurements with non absorbing particles showed that the current corrections of a cross sensitivity to particle scattering are not sufficient. Remaining cross sensitivities were found to be a function of the total particle load on the filter. The large variation between the response to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments indicates that current correction functions for absorption photometers are not adequate.
Schlagwörter
Fachgebiet (DDC)
550 - Geowissenschaften
Veranstaltung
Startdatum der Ausstellung
Enddatum der Ausstellung
Startdatum der Konferenz
Enddatum der Konferenz
Datum der letzten Prüfung
ISBN
ISSN
1867-8548
1867-1381
1867-1381
Sprache
Englisch
Während FHNW Zugehörigkeit erstellt
Nein
Zukunftsfelder FHNW
Publikationsstatus
Veröffentlicht
Begutachtung
Peer-Review der ganzen Publikation
Open Access-Status
Gold
Zitation
MÜLLER, Thomas, Bas HENZING, Gerrit DE LEEUW, Alfred WIEDENSOHLER, Andrés ALASTUEY, H. ANGELOV, Milan BIZJAK, Martine COLLAUD COEN, J. E. ENGSTRÖM, Carsten GRUENING, Risto HILLAMO, András HOFFER, Kornélia IMRE, Petko IVANOW, Stephen G. JENNINGS, Junying SUN, Nikos KALIVITIS, Hanna KARLSSON, Mikka KOMPPULA, Paolo LAJ, S.-M. LI, Chris LUNDER, Angela MARINONI, Sebastiao MARTINS DOS SANTOS, Marcel MOERMAN, Andreas NOWAK, John A. OGREN, Andreas PETZOLD, Jean Marc PICHON, Sergio RODRIQUEZ, Sangeeta SHARMA, Patrick J. SHERIDAN, Kimmo TEINILÄ, Thomas TUCH, Mar VIANA, Aki VIRKKULA, Ernest WEINGARTNER, R. WILHELM und Yaqiang WANG, 2011. Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers. result of two intercomparison workshops. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2011. Bd. 4, Nr. 2, S. 245–268. DOI 10.5194/amt-4-245-2011. Verfügbar unter: https://doi.org/10.26041/fhnw-9646