Promoting oral argumentation in citizenship education
Kein Vorschaubild vorhanden
Autor:in (Körperschaft)
Publikationsdatum
19.09.2024
Typ der Arbeit
Studiengang
Typ
06 - Präsentation
Herausgeber:innen
Herausgeber:in (Körperschaft)
Betreuer:in
Übergeordnetes Werk
Themenheft
DOI der Originalpublikation
Link
Reihe / Serie
Reihennummer
Jahrgang / Band
Ausgabe / Nummer
Seiten / Dauer
Patentnummer
Verlag / Herausgebende Institution
Verlagsort / Veranstaltungsort
Berlin
Auflage
Version
Programmiersprache
Abtretungsempfänger:in
Praxispartner:in/Auftraggeber:in
Zusammenfassung
Deliberative democracy theories advocate for the communicative activation of citizens in opinion formation. Therefore, civic education should introduce adolescents to deliberative processes and to promote their argumentative competence, which is understood as both a linguistic and a political competence. In accordance with our roots in deliberative democratic theory, we view argumentation as a dialogue-based process. This makes transactivity a key feature of good civic reasoning. Empirical evidence shows potential for instructional interventions to boost oral reasoning and critical thinking across subjects, but their effects often remain inconsistent. Data also suggests that students in deliberative settings are more willing to engage with opposing arguments and revise their own. Dialogues in small groups facilitate the acquisition of argumentation skills. Despite these findings, there's limited research on argumentation training effectiveness. In an intervention study (grades 8 and 9), Gronostay combined a thematic input with argumentation training, leading to more transactive speech acts during the subsequent fishbowl discussion in the experimental group. However, the revision and adaptation of their own arguments remained largely absent. This study investigates the effectiveness of an adapted version of Gronostay's strategy training in promoting transactive dialogues. The research involved six seasoned teachers and their classes in the 2022/23 school year, who were engaging with the subject of a cashless society. Despite standardized argumentation training, the quality of debates varied significantly between the classes studied. Influences on the quality of the debates include the social structure of the class, the influence of didactic scaffolding, such as argumentation training.
Schlagwörter
Politische Bildung, Argumentieren, Argumentationstraining
Fachgebiet (DDC)
370 - Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
320 - Politik
320 - Politik
Veranstaltung
SIG20 & SIG26 Conference
Startdatum der Ausstellung
Enddatum der Ausstellung
Startdatum der Konferenz
18.09.2024
Enddatum der Konferenz
20.09.2024
Datum der letzten Prüfung
ISBN
ISSN
Sprache
Englisch
Während FHNW Zugehörigkeit erstellt
Ja
Zukunftsfelder FHNW
Publikationsstatus
Begutachtung
Peer-Review des Abstracts
Open Access-Status
Lizenz
Zitation
WENGER, Liliane, Açelya AYDIN, Manuel HUBACHER und Monika WALDIS WEBER, 2024. Promoting oral argumentation in citizenship education. SIG20 & SIG26 Conference. Berlin. 19 September 2024. Verfügbar unter: https://irf.fhnw.ch/handle/11654/47433