Dies ist nicht die neueste Version dieses Items. Die neueste Version finden Sie hier.
Perceived privacy in home office and musculoskeletal complaints: a test of family–work conflict, work–family conflict, and relaxation as mediators
Lade...
Publikationsdatum
2022-10-29
Autor:innen
Wütschert, Milena Sina
Pereira, Diana
Eggli, Andrea
Schulze, Hartmut
Elfering, Achim
Zeitschriftentitel
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Bandtitel
Verlag
MDPI
Zusammenfassung
Many employees have had to telework all year during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even though working from home has many advantages, there are also some disadvantages worth to consider. Lack of privacy is a relevant factor when it comes to the development of severe musculoskelatal issues. This study investigated the link between perceived privacy in home office and musculoskeletal complaints (MSCs). Family–work conflict (FWC), work–family conflict (WFC), and relaxation were tested as potential mediators for the relationship between perceived privacy and MSCs. The present study’s questionnaire was filled out by 287 teleworking employees. Hypotheses were tested via multiple mediation analyses examining levels of perceived privacy in home office, and its relationship on MSCs. Furthermore, the underlying effect of FWC, WFC, and MSCs were tested with a structural equation model. As assumed, lack of privacy while working at home was linked to individuals more frequently experiencing MSCs. However, the structural equation model showed no significant mediation effect. Work design efforts must address privacy while employees perform telework at home to prevent MSCs.
Beschreibung
Schlagwörter
Home office, Musculoskeletal complaints, Family–work conflict, Work-family conflict
Zitierform
DOI der Originalpublikation
Zitation
WÜTSCHERT, Milena Sina, Diana PEREIRA, Andrea EGGLI, Hartmut SCHULZE und Achim ELFERING, 2022. Perceived privacy in home office and musculoskeletal complaints: a test of family–work conflict, work–family conflict, and relaxation as mediators. Social Sciences. 29 Oktober 2022. Bd. 2, Nr. 11, S. 1–20. DOI 10.1007/s43545-022-00553-y. Verfügbar unter: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00553-y