Institut für Marktangebote und Konsumentscheidungen
Dauerhafte URI für die Sammlunghttps://irf.fhnw.ch/handle/11654/26120
Listen
38 Ergebnisse
Ergebnisse nach Hochschule und Institut
Publikation Mehr als nur von A nach B: Wie wir unsere Reisezeit nutzen(19.09.2024) Moser, Corinne; Meyer, LorenzArbeiten, sich austauschen, Videos schauen, oder doch lieber Entspannen? Diese Studie untersucht, wie Reisende in der Schweiz ihre Reisezeit nutzen. Im Zentrum steht eine Online-Befragung von über 2‘000 Personen, die über ihre Tätigkeiten während einer bestimmten, kürzlich gereisten Etappe berichten. Wir zeigen differenziert nach verschiedenen Verkehrsmitteln auf, wie Reisende ihre Reisezeit nutzen und was sie sich in Zukunft wünschen, um Reisezeiten noch besser nutzen zu können. Auf Grundlage unserer Erkenntnisse leiten wir Empfehlungen für die künftige Verkehrspolitik und -planung ab.06 - PräsentationPublikation Synthese Energieforschung Stadt Zürich, umgesetzt als Website(Energieforschung Stadt Zürich, 2021) Dettli, Reto; Hammer, Stephan; Moser, Corinne; Rieder, Stefan05 - Forschungs- oder ArbeitsberichtPublikation Nutzung der Reisezeit. Forschungsprojekt SVI 2018/007 auf Antrag der Schweizerischen Vereinigung der Verkehrsingenieure und Verkehrsexperten (SVI)(Bundesamt für Strassen ASTRA, 2023) Buser, Benjamin; Moser, Corinne; Meyer, Lorenz; Bade, Stephanie; Schneider, Thomas05 - Forschungs- oder ArbeitsberichtPublikation On the understanding and processing of extensive timescales. The long-term dimension of nuclear waste(Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH), 2012) Moser, Corinne11 - Studentische ArbeitPublikation Wirkung von Sharing-Angeboten auf Mobilitätsgewohnheiten und Mobilitätswerkzeuge(Energieforschung Stadt Zürich, 2021) Moser, Corinne; Artho, Jürg; Capillo, Mariacarla; Bibic, Vanessa05 - Forschungs- oder ArbeitsberichtPublikation A new epistemic community in nuclear waste governance? Theoretical reflections and empirical observations on some fundamental challenges(Intellect, 2010) Stauffacher, Michael; Moser, CorinneDiscourses around nuclear waste were, for decades, dominated by techn(ocrat)ic debates. The respective international group of experts can be understood as an epistemic community (Haas 1992), as this community impacts on the way an issue is perceived and discussed. Yet, nuclear waste is not only a technical, but also a so-called socio-technical problem, and hence the discourses have been broadened. Lately, risk communication has become ubiquitous in discussions on the siting of nuclear waste across the globe. Lay knowledge, risk perception, involvement and procedural justice are some of the terms used and negotiated here. Thus, the question can be posed as to whether this trend will lead to the development of a new epistemic community that also includes experts on social scientific aspects. Using a set of different sources, we demonstrate potential difficulties in the mutual understanding of interdisciplinary teams in nuclear waste governance. We conclude by arguing that epistemological differences and structural challenges are so fundamental that it is unlikely that a new epistemic community will be able to develop.01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher ZeitschriftPublikation The process matters: Fairness in repository siting for nuclear waste(Springer, 2012) Krütli, Pius; Stauffacher, Michael; Pedolin, Dario; Moser, Corinne; Scholz, Roland W.01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher ZeitschriftPublikation Literature review: Public perception of geothermal energy(vdf Hochschulverlag, 2015) Moser, Corinne; Stauffacher, Michael; Hirschberg, Stefan; Wiemer, Stefan; Burgherr, Peter04A - Beitrag SammelbandPublikation 06 - PräsentationPublikation The crucial role of nomothetic and idiographic conceptions of time: Interdisciplinary collaboration in nuclear waste management(Wiley, 2012) Moser, Corinne; Stauffacher, Michael; Krütli, Pius; Scholz, Roland W.The disposal of nuclear waste involves extensive time scales. Technical experts consider up to 1 million years for the disposal of spent fuel and high‐level waste in their safety assessment. Yet nuclear waste is not only a technical but also a so‐called sociotechnical problem and, therefore, requires interdisciplinary collaboration between technical, natural, social sciences, and the humanities in its management. Given that these disciplines differ in their language, epistemics, and interests, such collaboration might be problematic. Based on evidence from cognitive psychology, we suggest that, in particular, a concept like time is presumably critical and can be understood differently. This study explores how different scientific disciplines understand extensive time scales in general and then focuses on nuclear waste. Eighteen qualitative exploratory interviews were conducted with experts for time‐related phenomena of different disciplines, among them experts working in nuclear waste management. Analyses revealed two distinct conceptions of time corresponding to idiographic and nomothetic research approaches: scientists from the humanities and social sciences tend to have a more open, undetermined conception of time, whereas natural scientists tend to focus on a more determined conception that includes some undetermined aspects. Our analyses lead to reflections on potential difficulties for interdisciplinary teams in nuclear waste management. We focus on the understanding of the safety assessment, on potential implications for communication between experts from different disciplines (e.g., between experts from the humanities and engineering for risk assessment and risk communication), and we reflect on the roles of different disciplines in nuclear waste management.01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift