Hochschule für Angewandte Psychologie FHNW
Dauerhafte URI für den Bereichhttps://irf.fhnw.ch/handle/11654/1
Listen
12 Ergebnisse
Bereich: Suchergebnisse
Publikation Feldstudie zur aktuellen EU-Verordnung bzgl. der Arbeitsdauern bei der visuellen Inspektion von Gepäckröntgenbildern - Teil 2(03.03.2022) Sterchi, Yanik; Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation Arbeitsdauern bei der visuellen Inspektion von Gepäckröntgenbildern(05.03.2021) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation Field study regarding the work duration for the visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage(06.09.2022) Sterchi, Yanik; Buser, Daniela; Sauer, Juergen; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation The effects of workload and time on task on detection performance in X-ray cabin baggage screening(21.04.2022) Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sterchi, Yanik06 - PräsentationPublikation Field study regarding the work duration for the visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage(21.03.2022) Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sterchi, Yanik06 - PräsentationPublikation Field study: Time on task for X-ray screening of cabin baggage(10/2021) Buser, Daniela; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sterchi, Yanik06 - PräsentationPublikation Einfluss von Arbeitsdauer und Pausen auf die Leistung von Sicherheitsbeauftragten während 60 Minuten Röntgenbildanalyse von Handgepäck(03.03.2020) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation Time on task and detection performance in cabin baggage X-ray screening(24.11.2020) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, Adrian06 - PräsentationPublikation Why stop after 20 minutes? Breaks and target prevalence in a 60-minute X-ray baggage screening task(Elsevier, 03/2020) Buser, Daniela; Sterchi, Yanik; Schwaninger, AdrianCurrent EU regulation restricts continuously reviewing X-ray images of passenger baggage to 20-min duration as a precautionary measure to prevent performance decrements in airport security officers (screeners). However, this 20-min limit is not based on clear empirical evidence on how well screeners can sustain their performance over time. Our study tested screeners in a 60-min simulated X-ray cabin baggage screening task. One group took 10-min breaks after 20 min of screening; the other group worked without breaks. We found no decrease in performance over 60 min in either group. Breaks did not affect performance, but they did reduce the amount of subjective distress. By varying target prevalence, we found that da with a slope of about 0.6 is a more valid measure of detection performance than d’. Target prevalence caused a criterion shift. Our results provide a basis for conducting field studies of prolonged screening durations, and open the discussion on whether more flexible break policies and work schedules should be considered.01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
