Hochschule für Angewandte Psychologie FHNW
Dauerhafte URI für den Bereichhttps://irf.fhnw.ch/handle/11654/1
Listen
12 Ergebnisse
Bereich: Suchergebnisse
Publikation Autonomes Fahren im Live-Test. In Regensburg bringt der People Mover Fahrgäste von A nach B(TRIO Hochschulverbund Transfer und Innovation Ostbayern, 2021) Hudecek, Matthias; Fischer, Peter; Krakowitzer, Marco01B - Beitrag in Magazin oder ZeitungPublikation Beyond words: investigating non-verbal indicators of collaborative engagement in a virtual synchronous CSCL environment(Frontiers Research Foundation, 14.08.2024) Jeitziner, Loris Tizian; Paneth, Lisa; Rack, Oliver; Zahn, CarmenIn the future of higher education, student learning will become more virtual and group-oriented, and this new reality of academic learning comes with challenges. Positive social interactions in virtual synchronous student learning groups are not self-evident but need extra support. To successfully support positive social interactions, the underlying group processes, such as collaborative group engagement, need to be understood in detail, and the important question arises: How can collaborative group engagement be assessed in virtual group learning settings? A promising methodological approach is the observation of students’ non-verbal behavior, for example, in videoconferences. In an exploratory field study, we observed the non-verbal behavior of psychology students in small virtual synchronous learning groups solving a complex problem via videoconferencing. The groups were videorecorded to analyze possible relations between their non-verbal behaviors and to rate the quality of collaborative group engagement01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher ZeitschriftPublikation TEAMs go VR - validating the TEAM in a virtual reality (VR) medical team training(BioMed Central, 2024) Wespi, Rafael; Schwendimann, Lukas; Neher, Andrea; Birrenbach, Tanja; Schauber, Stefan K.; Manser, Tanja; Sauter, Thomas C.; Kämmer, Juliane E.Abstract Background Inadequate collaboration in healthcare can lead to medical errors, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary teamwork training. Virtual reality (VR) simulation-based training presents a promising, cost-effective approach. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) for assessing healthcare student teams in VR environments to improve training methodologies. Methods Forty-two medical and nursing students participated in a VR-based neurological emergency scenario as part of an interprofessional team training program. Their performances were assessed using a modified TEAM tool by two trained coders. Reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity of the tool were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha. Results Rater agreement on TEAM’s leadership, teamwork, and task management domains was high, with ICC values between 0.75 and 0.90. Leadership demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90), while teamwork and task management showed moderate to acceptable consistency (alpha = 0.78 and 0.72, respectively). Overall, the TEAM tool exhibited high internal consistency (alpha = 0.89) and strong concurrent validity with significant correlations to global performance ratings. Conclusion The TEAM tool proved to be a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating team dynamics in VR-based training scenarios. This study highlights VR’s potential in enhancing medical education, especially in remote or distanced learning contexts. It demonstrates a dependable approach for team performance assessment, adding value to VR-based medical training. These findings pave the way for more effective, accessible interdisciplinary team assessments, contributing significantly to the advancement of medical education.01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher ZeitschriftPublikation Performance of X-ray baggage screeners in different work environments: comparing remote and local cabin baggage screening(Elsevier, 07/2024) Latscha, Marius; Schwaninger, Adrian; Sauer, Jürgen; Sterchi, Yanik01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher ZeitschriftPublikation Developing the TeamOBS-vacuum-assisted delivery checklist to assess clinical performance in a vacuum-assisted delivery: a Delphi study with initial validation(Frontiers Research Foundation, 2024) Brogaard, Lise; Hinshaw, Kim; Kierkegaard, Ole; Manser, Tanja; Uldbjerg, Niels; Hvidman, LoneIn Northern Europe, vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD) accounts for 6–15% of all deliveries; VAD is considered safe when conducted by adequately trained personnel. However, failed vacuum extraction can be harmful to both the mother and child. Therefore, the clinical performance in VAD must be assessed to guide learning, determine a performance benchmark, and evaluate the quality to achieve an overall high performance. We were unable to identify a pre-existing tool for evaluating the clinical performance in real-life vacuum-assisted births. We aimed to develop and validate a checklist for assessing the clinical performance in VAD. We conducted a Delphi process, described as an interactive process where experts answer questions until answers converge toward a “joint opinion” (consensus). We invited international experts as Delphi panelists and reached a consensus after four Delphi rounds, described as follows: (1) the panelists were asked to add, remove, or suggest corrections to the preliminary list of items essential for evaluating clinical performance in VAD; (2) the panelists applied weights of clinical importance on a Likert scale of 1–5 for each item; (3) each panelist revised their original scores after reviewing a summary of the other panelists’ scores and arguments; and (4) the TeamOBS-VAD was tested using videos of real-life VADs, and the Delphi panel made final adjustments and approved the checklist. Twelve Delphi panelists from the UK (n = 3), Norway (n = 2), Sweden (n = 3), Denmark (n = 3), and Iceland (n = 1) were included. After four Delphi rounds, the Delphi panel reached a consensus on the checklist items and scores. The TeamOBS-VAD checklist was tested using 60 videos of real-life vacuum extractions. The inter-rater agreement had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.73; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of [0.58, 0.83], and that for the average of two raters was ICC 0.84 95% CI [0.73, 0.91]. The TeamOBS-VAD score was not associated with difficulties in delivery, such as the number of contractions during vacuum extraction delivery, cephalic level, rotation, and position. Failed vacuum extraction occurred in 6% of the video deliveries, but none were associated with the teams with low clinical performance scores. The TeamOBS-VAD checklist provides a valid and reliable evaluation of the clinical performance of vaginal-assisted vacuum extraction.01A - Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher ZeitschriftPublikation Der Einsatz eines sozialen Roboters in der Betreuung älterer Personen in Pflegeheimen aus der Sicht von Aktivierungstherpeut:innen und Hochbetagten(GfA Press, 2023) Schulze, Hartmut; Tanner, Alexandra; Rüegg, Michelle; Urech, Andreas; Rietschin, JoëlBisher existieren fast keine Studien, in denen unter Einbezug von Aktivierungstherapeut*innen Prinzipien der Aktivierungstherapie wie z.B. das Forward- und Backward Chaining (das gezielte Weglassen oder Hinzufügen von Worten z.B. beim Sprichwort raten mit dem Ziel einen Lerneffekt zu erreichen) auf Roboterszenarien übertragen und mit Hochbetagten Bewohnenden in Pflegeheimen getestet wurden. In dem Beitrag wird über die Vorgehensweise und die Ergebnisse zweier Studien berichtet, in denen genau diese Ziele verfolgt wurden: In einer ersten Studie wurde aufsetzend auf einer Anforderungsanalyse ein Kognitionstrainingsspiel für zwei verschiedene soziale Roboter (Pepper und QTrobot) entwickelt. Anschließend wurde dieses im Social Robotics Labor der Hochschule für Angewandte Psychologie FHNW von Aktivierungstherapeut*innen (N = 8) hinsichtlich Eignung und Mehrwert für die Altersarbeit und die Aktivierungstherapie evaluiert. In einer zweiten Studie wurde in einem Pflegeheim ein mehrtägiger Einsatz des sozialen Roboters Pepper zur Aktivierung von Hochbetagten (N = 5) in einem Einzel- und Gruppensetting erprobt. Die Interaktionen wurden auf Video aufgezeichnet, im Nachgang ausgewertet und mit Kurzinterviews mit den Hochbetagten sowie einer Aktivierungstherapeutin trianguliert.04B - Beitrag KonferenzschriftPublikation sWafety: A Complementary Low-threshold Safety Management Process(2023) Schenkel, Sandra; Medici, Guri; Staender, Sven; Wäfler, ToniEffective safety management requires a reliable information basis. At the same time, established safety management systems (SMS) and surveys are known to have certain limitations, such as low participation rates or data bias due to the influence of situational factors (e.g., Pfeiffer, Manser & Wehner, 2010; Sujan, 2015). In collaboration with Swiss companies from the aviation, nuclear and healthcare industries, sWafety was developed and tested as a complementary process concept to address these shortcomings. sWafety provides a low-threshold process design and digital tool that aims to further engage and motivate employees to participate in data collection, analysis, and feedback to further improve data quality.This paper describes the design of the sWafety process, which is based on a user-centered approach as well as insights from motivation theory, gamification, and practical expertise. Key process elements are presented that support motivated employee participation through short survey cycles, low respondent burden, direct feedback processes and active user involvement in data interpretation and safety measure development. Based on a use case with a Swiss hospital, a minimum viable app-prototype was applied to test the extent to which key process elements can be transferred to operational practice and how they are evaluated by users. An eight-day application scenario of sWafety was conducted with a team of anesthesia professionals (n = 7). Prototyped process elements included daily app-based data collection and alternating feedback presentation. A formative evaluation was conducted by means of a workshop.The results of a qualitative content analysis indicate that the key process elements are transferable to operational practice. Concisely worded questions, tasks, or feedback that encourage reflection and learning, were found to be more motivating than gamification. Timely feedback, particularly on work-related information, and full transparency regarding the purposes and outcomes of the surveys also appear to be very important factors motivating participation in providing safety-related data. However, users called for more opportunities to provide bottom-up information and a more active role in discussing findings and developing safety measures.Effective implementation of sWafety into operational practice requires that the general process design is adapted to a company’s specifics. Particular attention should be paid to how local, decentralized processes can be implemented to enable timely feedback and appropriate employee involvement in discussing results and developing safety measures. Regarding low-threshold process design, the results imply that elements which trigger intrinsic motivation (e.g., learning or reflection) should be preferred over gamification. Also, further development of technical solutions for flexible interaction with the app and for data analysis can further increase the potential of sWafety.04B - Beitrag KonferenzschriftPublikation Arbeitsgestaltung für die Zukunft – Aber wie? Identifikation von Chancen und Risiken künftiger Automatisierung und Digitalisierung(03/2019) Fischer, Katrin; Kuhn, Christina; Ehrat, Franco; Fraefel, René; Wäfler, Toni06 - Präsentation
