Zahn, Carmen
E-Mail-Adresse
Geburtsdatum
Projekt
Organisationseinheiten
Berufsbeschreibung
Nachname
Vorname
Name
Suchergebnisse
Predicting engagement in computer-supported collaborative learning groups using natural language processing
2024-03-20, Jeitziner, Loris Tizian, Paneth, Lisa, Rack, Oliver, Zahn, Carmen, Wulff, Dirk
Collaborative group engagement is a key factor of success in learning groups. This work explores the development of an innovative natural language processing method for predicting collaborative group engagement. To this end, we identified linguistic markers based on an established observation-based scheme for rating collaborative group engagement, such as, semantic similarity to task instructions, verbal mimicry, sentiment, and use of jargon. We evaluated the predictive power of the linguistic markers on the data of an observational study in which 38 learning groups were instructed to perform a collaborative learning task. Overall, the data consisted of 2588 expert ratings on collaborative group engagement. We relied on machine learning to the predict collaborative group engagement ratings using informative subsets of linguistic markers. The results showed above-baseline predictive accuracy for all four dimensions of collaborative group engagement. Moreover, the analysis of feature importance points to quantity of utterances, responsiveness and uniformity of participation as the most important markers for collaborative group engagement. By harnessing natural language processing, this work extends traditional qualitative analysis and delivers nuanced quantitative metrics suitable for capturing the complexity and dynamics of contemporary Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) environments. Thereby, it contributes to the evolving landscape of CSCL research and demonstrates the potential of novel analytic techniques to support and enrich qualitative analysis in multiple domains.
Künstliche Intelligenz als Teammitglied in Lerngruppen – Wie möchten Studierende gemeinsam mit künstlicher Intelligenz kooperieren?
2023-01-20, Paneth, Lisa, Rack, Oliver, Zahn, Carmen
What if the computer crashes? Findings from an exploratory factor analysis on stressors in online exams
2022-06, Jeitziner, Loris Tizian, Roos, Anna-Lena, Ruf, Alessia, Zahn, Carmen
The pandemic has forced higher education to shift from onsite to online environments. This novel situation may increase students’ exam stress and induce new stressors. In the present study, we identified stressors in online exams by conducting an exploratory factor analysis of a novel questionnaire. The analysis revealed five factors that categorize students’ experience of stress. Preliminary descriptive results suggest that possible system failures and social pressures cause the highest stress for students.
Logible: Detecting, Analyzing and Visualizing Behavior Sequences for Investigating Learning Behavior
2021, Ruf, Alessia, Jäger, Joscha, Niederhauser, Mario, Zahn, Carmen, Opwis, Klaus, Wichmann, Astrid, Hoppe, H. Ulrich, Rummel, Nikol
Logible is a highly sensitive web-based interactive tool that automatically detects behavior sequences from raw log files. It further analyzes and visualizes sequences and allows for comparisons of behavior data between different experimental conditions without the use of other software. Logible was developed based on an iterative, exploratory, and rule-based method devised to find meaningful sequences from 92 data sets of students who learned individually or collaboratively with an enhanced video-based environment. The tool is customizable and thus enables researchers to investigate learning behavior with various kinds of sequentially logged interaction data (from web-based video environments, online learning platforms etc.).
Trend Monitoring & Erarbeitung fundierter Entscheidungsgrundlagen für die Entwicklung von FHNW Learning Spaces
2023-12-31, Jeitziner, Loris Tizian, Frick, Andrea, Paneth, Lisa, Zahn, Carmen
Poster Presentation of Project Examples in the Field of Artificial Intelligence
2022-11-17, Schwaninger, Adrian, Sterchi, Yanik, Wäfler, Toni, Renggli, Philipp, Rack, Oliver, Bleisch, Susanne, Paneth, Lisa, Jeitziner, Loris Tizian, Gasparik, Matus, Zahn, Carmen
Grundbausteine engagierter Zusammenarbeit in Lerngruppen
2021-01-28, Zahn, Carmen, Paneth, Lisa
Stressors in online exams – Same same but different?
2023-06, Roos, Anna-Lena, Jeitziner, Loris Tizian, Zahn, Carmen
Exploring nonverbal behavior and collaborative group engagement in online learning groups
2022-07-22, Rack, Oliver, Paneth, Lisa, Jeitziner, Loris Tizian, Zahn, Carmen
In an explorative field study, we investigated nonverbal behavior and collaborative group engagement (QCGE) in online learning groups. Participants in small groups performed a hidden profile task. Results suggests differences within and between groups in their nonverbal behavior. We expect that nonverbal behaviors relate to QCGE in online learning groups.
Impact of learners’ video interactions on learning success and cognitive load
2021, Ruf, Alessia, Leisner, David, Zahn, Carmen, Opwis, Klaus, Hmelo-Silver, Cindy, de Wever, Bram, Oshima, Jun
Enhanced video-based learning environments provide new tools (e.g., hyperlinks) – along with the well-known basic video control tools (e.g., play, pause, rewind) – that afford learners‘ enhanced interaction with videos. With these tools, learners can actively transform existing videos into their own hypervideo structures by adding hyperlinks and own materials. Unlike research on basic control tools that has revealed positive impacts on learning, research on enhanced tools is still rare and conflicting. It is thus open, whether the tools support generative interested learning or put too much extrinsic cognitive load onto learners. In the present study, we investigated the effects of video annotation and hyperlinking tools on learning success and cognitive load by analyzing tool-related interaction behavior data of 141 university students. Results indicated that the frequent use of enhanced video tools positively predicted learning success and a decrease in cognitive load. Implications of these results are discussed.